Navigating the sanctions storm

“It is the only thing between diplomacy and war and as such has become the most important foreign policy tool in the US arsenal. And yet, nobody in government is sure this whole strategy is even working.”

-- Bill Reinsch, a former Commerce Department official and now the Scholl chair in international business at the Center for Strategic and International Studies

Sanctions have become a considerable cornerstone of US foreign policy, with the United States imposing three times as many sanctions as any other country.

This powerful tool can cripple industries, erase fortunes, and shift political landscapes without risking American lives. However, the overuse of sanctions raises concerns at the highest levels of government and across C-suites.

While sanctions have historically achieved significant outcomes, such as ending apartheid in South Africa and toppling Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic, their effectiveness is not universal.

North Korea’s continued nuclear ambitions and the resilience of Nicaragua’s authoritarian regime highlight the limitations of this approach. Moreover, sanctions can have severe unintended consequences, as seen in Venezuela’s economic collapse.

The proliferation of sanctions has also fueled a multibillion-dollar advocacy industry in Washington, with law firms and lobbying groups capitalizing on the complex system. This has led to a “sanctions reflex,” where the US response to global issues is increasingly punitive.

Treasury Secretary Jack Lew’s 2016 prescient warning about “sanctions overreach” remains relevant today as the US continues to impose financial penalties at a record pace.

Bottom line...

The extensive use of sanctions by the US government underscores the need for businesses to conduct thorough geopolitical risk assessments. Companies must anticipate potential sanctions and their impacts on global operations, supply chains, and market access.

Understanding the nuances of different markets and their relationships with the US becomes crucial. Building strong local partnerships can help navigate the complexities of operating in potentially sanctionable environments.

The growth of a multibillion-dollar industry around sanctions compliance in Washington demonstrates that regulatory challenges can create communications opportunities.

Companies would be wise to engage with the media proactively to shape the narrative around your company's approach to sanctions compliance. This could involve interviews, op-eds, or background briefings with key journalists.

Internally, companies should develop a crisis communication plan specifically for sanctions-related incidents. This would include prepared statements, designated spokespersons, and clear escalation procedures.

Caracal is here to help.

Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.

-Marc

Read: How four US Presidents unleashed economic warfare across the globe: US sanctions have surged over the last two decades and are now in effect on almost one-third of all nations. But are they doing more harm than we realize? The Washington Post

The CrowdStike BSOD incident

In light of the CrowdStike BSOD incident, it's crucial to acknowledge the impact of regulatory frameworks on cybersecurity.

The Telegraph reports that Microsoft has attributed the recent IT outage to EU rules that prevented necessary security changes.

According to a Microsoft blog post, this IT outage affected only 8.5 million Windows or less than 1% of Microsoft's global footprint.

Still, at just one percent of Microsoft's global footprint., one cybersecurity expert described the incident as potentially the "largest IT outage in history," which caused widespread chaos across various sectors.

The incident resulted in at least 5,000 commercial airline flights being canceled worldwide and counting. It also impacted businesses ranging from retail to logistics to healthcare facilities. The outage led to significant losses in revenue, staff time, and overall productivity.

While the full financial impact of Friday's worldwide internet breakdown is still being assessed, experts suggest that the costs could exceed $1 billion.

Now imagine if 7% of Microsoft's global footprint was hit.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the intricate balance that needs to be maintained between regulatory compliance and robust cybersecurity measures.

It's a complex challenge that we must navigate.

The 2009 agreement with the European Commission, designed to ensure fair access for security software makers, inadvertently restricted Microsoft's ability to block the CrowdStrike update, which led to widespread disruptions.

This situation highlights the need for ongoing dialogue between tech companies and regulatory bodies to adapt to evolving security threats.

Bottom line...

For global companies, this incident underscores the importance of maintaining an open and ongoing dialogue with regulatory bodies. Senior leadership must proactively engage with regulators to ensure that rules remain relevant and do not inadvertently increase vulnerabilities.

For global business communicators, this is a stark reminder that clear and timely communication with all stakeholders—- including customers, partners, regulators, and the public—is crucial during such incidents to manage reputations and mitigate further disruptions.

Caracal is here to help.

Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.

-Marc

China: Innovation hub AND Geopolitical risk

Last year, Volkswagen invested over $1 billion in an innovation center in Hefei, while Bosch is building a similar $1 billion R&D outpost in Suzhou. These investments highlight China’s growing importance as a hub for cutting-edge technology development.

HSBC is also making strides, employing thousands at an R&D center in southern China to explore AI, blockchain, and biometrics. The region’s surplus of young engineers and scientists is a major draw for these multinational giants.

Even cosmetic companies are getting into the game as they can rapidly leverage China’s market to test and launch new products. This agile approach allows them to gauge consumer reactions quickly and refine their offerings before introducing them globally.

However, the landscape is shifting.

The US Department of the Treasury’s draft rules could soon restrict American firms from investing in key tech sectors in China. Simultaneously, China’s security measures are tightening, making it harder to transfer intellectual property abroad.

Bottom line...

While China offers significant opportunities in market size, talent, and innovation potential, there are also increasing risks related to intellectual property protection and technology transfer, dictated by laws and priorities from Beijing and other national capitals.

Companies need to weigh these factors carefully in their strategic decision-making.

Plus, the potential US restrictions on investments in China underscore the need for businesses to be aware of and adaptable to geopolitical shifts.

Companies must have contingency plans and diversified strategies to mitigate the risks of changing international relations and regulations.

Caracal is here to help.

Enjoy the ride + plan accordingly.

-Marc

Read: China is the West’s corporate R&D lab. Can it remain so? The Economist